sent 11/29/13 McClatchy: U.S. energy dominance--"That change will reorder the globe in ways large and small"

McClatchy: U.S. energy dominance--"That change will reorder the globe in ways large and small" November 28, 2013
by Tim Johnson, McClatchy Foreign Staff
http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2013/11/28/209033/rise-of-saudi-america-will-alter.html

I suggest that we have great respect for what Tim Johnson has to say.  As I have mentioned numerous time before, McClatchy is the third largest city newspaper organization.  It provides the major paper in a lot of U.S. cities.  It is respected as one of the very few remaining news sources that still has its own actual investigative reporters who go investigate world news directly, rather than relying on handouts.  They are totally serious about reporting the news.  So is their foreign staff.

The big details of the world and which countries have energy dominance have changed.  It is coming to be the United States and NOT OPEC!  That change will reorder the globe in ways large and small, to quote Tim Johnson in this article.

This is huge food for thought and whatever mental (and physical?) adjustment may result.

--
When the sky is blue it is blue even if someone whom you do not like says it is blue. love, Larry

sent 11/29/13 "World Fights Back Against the Biggest Brother in History"

"World Fights Back Against the Biggest Brother in History"
by Sonali Kolhatkar, November 28, 2013
http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/world_fights_back_against_the_biggest_brother_in_history_20131128

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.  For now I am betting on the "Five Eyes," so called since 1941, we have learned recently, but really, it does seem that much of the world is in somewhat of an uproar now against the total surveillance of the "Five Eyes"--the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, New Zealand and Australia.

The term "Big Brother" as it is used in the above article title comes from 1984, a huge classic novel by George Orwell that was published in 1950.  If you haven't read it, it's not too late to remedy your loss.  You might want to start by reading the reviews at Amazon.  It's about trying to build and maintain one's individuality in the face of the fear of invasion of privacy by the government.
paperback
http://www.amazon.com/1984-Signet-Classics-George-Orwell/dp/0451524934/
kindle
http://www.amazon.com/1984-George-Orwell-ebook/dp/B003JTHWKU/

And in our present reality it is not just the government that those of us who happen not to be of the authoritarian personality type have to fear.  It is also some of the big corporations that we have to fear, including U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Wal-Mart, Monsanto, Bank of America, Dow Chemical, Kraft, Coca-Cola, Chevron, Burger King, McDonald’s, Shell and BP.  Those are the ones some of whose subversive activities have been detected (so far).  The report says they use former CIA, NSA and FBI agents to conduct private surveillance work, which is often illegal but almost never prosecuted.  No I do not mean that we MUST feel fear.  I mean that the invasion is there for us to look out for.
"Revealed: How Corporate Spooks Spy on Nonprofit Activist Groups"
by Joshua Holland, November 25, 2013
http://billmoyers.com/2013/11/25/revealed-how-corporate-spooks-spy-on-nonprofit-activist-groups/
Underlying report (not a page, a download link):
http://www.corporatepolicy.org/spookybusiness.pdf

--
When the sky is blue it is blue even if someone whom you do not like says it is blue. love, Larry

http://larryatblogspot.blogspot.com/


sent 11/29/13 Web of debt

A few years ago now I did hard study and expended considerable energy sharing the "secrets" of our banking system.  It is not really secret.  It is just stuff that the bankers see no point in discussing in public and that I think most people have not gone out of their way to look for.  But as an influential factor, our fractional reserve banking system is actually right up there in importance with planetary heating, if you think planetary heating is a factor worth considering.

This is the 47min video Money as Debt that I pointed to back in 2008.  [nb. 10/8/2017--the video is now at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2nBPN-MKefA.]

This is about the now-classic book on the subject by Ellen Hodgson Brown:
http://www.webofdebt.com/
http://www.amazon.com/Web-Debt-Shocking-Truth-System/dp/0983330859/

I don't suppose you can read my mind.  The facts of our fractional reserve banking system--"the web of debt"--particularly the fact that PROFITS MUST INCREASE CONTINUOUSLY AND THE SUM OF PRIVATE AND PUBLIC DEBT MUST INCREASE CONTINUOUSLY OR ELSE relate directly to some of the big details in the article by Naomi Klein that I pointed out to you on November 19th along with a few also important recent things from other people.

Basically it is that really no one is in charge of it, although each of us has some control, or potential for control one way or another.

repeating from November 19th--to do with "emergency conflation:
"How Science Is Telling Us All To Revolt"
by Naomi Klein October 29, 2013
http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/10/science-says-revolt
or
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/10/29-4?print

love,
--
When the sky is blue it is blue even if someone whom you do not like says it is blue. love, Larry

11/29/13 Ellen Hodgson Brown (Web of Debt) "Monsanto, the TPP, and Global Food Dominance"

Subject: Ellen Hodgson Brown (Web of Debt) "Monsanto, the TPP, and Global Food Dominance"

I hope that you may remember the name Ellen Hodgson Brown.  She understands and has made clear the simplified details of our banking system, known as the fractional reserve banking system.  It underlies everything that is going on that has anything to do at all with money, including your money, my money, and everyone else's money.  See "Web of debt" 11/29/13.  I've seen today that this November 26, 2013 article is being republished and discussed now in many places.

"Monsanto, the TPP, and Global Food Dominance"
by Ellen Hodgson Brown, November 26, 2013
http://ellenbrown.com/2013/11/26/monsanto-the-tpp-and-global-food-dominance/

Do please focus on all of what she says for just a bit.  THEN PLEASE FOCUS ON STOPPING THE TPP.*
See for help:
http://larryatblogspot.blogspot.com/2013/11/sent-112413-mark-weisbrot-on-tpp-re.html
see also http://fcnl.org/resources/toolkit/lobbying_tips/

This is not to diminish the importance of all of the other things that there are that are worth focusing on as well.  But, hey, one thing at a time, even if we go from one thing to another somewhat quickly, right?

* "Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty" It's evil and it's big. And you can help.  Here are a few additional articles that I have happened upon in my travels:

This is a repository of articles that have been published, listing their titles, headlines, and links:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/tag/tpp
Here are the most recent two there.  They are on different major aspects of the problems with the TPP:
"United Against the Secret Trade Agreement (TPP) That Blocks Affordable Health Care -- And Much More"
by Barbara J. Easterling, November 27, 2013
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/barbara-j-easterling/united-against-the-secret_b_4339742.html
"For Free Trade's Sake, Get IP Out of the TPP"
by Bill Watson, November 22, 2013
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/bill-watson/for-free-trades-sake_b_4325963.html

"Obama, Pelosi And Reid Greeted By Anti-TPP Protesters In LA"
by Lauren Steiner, November 28, 2013
http://www.popularresistance.org/obama-pelosi-and-reid-greeted-by-anti-tpp-protesters-in-la/

Here are some major action sites--besides the FCNL site:
http://stoptpp.org/
http://www.flushthetpp.org/

AFL/CIO resolution 12 on the TPP:
https://www.aflcio.org/content/download/96091/2631691/Res12.pdf

The sky is a very lovely blue here today. :-)
--
When the sky is blue it is blue even if someone whom you do not like says it is blue.  love, Larry

http://larryatblogspot.blogspot.com/

sent 11/28/13 "How My Mind Changed" PASS THIS TO AT LEAST SIX PEOPLE IN THE NEXT 10 MINUTES

Subject: "How My Mind Changed" PASS THIS TO AT LEAST SIX PEOPLE IN THE NEXT 10 MINUTES

You know those messages people pass to others, the ones that make it easier for us to let others know that we love them because there's a good message already written for us to send on? 

Please think of this as one of those messages, that I am passing on to you to tell you I love you and that you can pass on to people whom you love.  That's what this is about.  That's where the "pass this to at least six people in the next 10 minutes" thing came from. :-) 
------------------------
-by way of Rev. Forrest Church, given to a bunch of people September 20, 1998, part of "How My Mind Has Changed."

..... As for my sermon, the good news is, given that Kami sent my last week's sermon about the Clinton mess out to everyone, and given that my mind hasn't changed over the last seven days, I can talk about something else this Sunday. The bad news is, for those of you who came to church to hear something really important or earthshattering, I am going to devote my last sermon as a forty-something person to a free-flowing set of ruminations about myself.

Actually, I'm going to do this twice over the course of the fall -- I'll wait till November for the second -- sharing with you how my mind has changed, which means in essence how I have changed, during my twenty year call as your minister. I have to do it twice, because I have a few theological observations that won't fit in this morning's sermon. How my mind has changed about the Bible, for instance, and how my mind has changed about God. But before I get to that, I have to do something that almost undoubtedly is less important but does by nature take precedent, how my mind has changed about myself.

To ensure that you will leave this morning with at least one story that will make you feel better about yourselves -- better at least about the most stupid thing you have done recently -- let me share with you the most egregiously stupid act I committed on the verge of fifty.

Until about a month ago, I have been completely bored by members of this congregation who came in for pastoral counseling about the trauma of turning forty or fifty, or even thirty for goodness sake. Fortunately, by the time we reach sixty most of us have come close to growing up, by seventy we've made it, and by eighty or ninety our daily pains are more likely to preoccupy us than our birthdays are. Nonetheless, until last month, I had little sympathy for any prospective fifty-year old who was obsessing about getting old. And then it happened to me.

So what did I do? I went back to the gym. I changed my diet. I lost 20 pounds. And then, or during the course of all this, I simply lost it. I did the stupidest thing among those things that don't really matter that I'd done since I was sixteen. I dyed my hair.

Don't laugh (Okay, you can laugh!) But just think of how magnificent I would look right now if you had seen me the day I did it. Black. I chose black. My hair has never been black, but since I always take three aspirins rather than two when I have a headache, black somehow seemed right. Fortunately, I was alone at the time, alone for three days at home writing, with my wife away on business and the children at camp. I dyed both my hair and my beard. I dyed them black.

After an initial blush of admittedly vain self-satisfaction, I looked at myself in the mirror the next morning and was appalled. I may have looked fairly good, but I sure didn't look right. So I started taking showers. Three a day. I even tried shampooing with something made for men than is supposed to enhance one's gray hair. The problem was, my hair wasn't gray any longer. It was black.

But not for long. At the end of three days, not only was I cleaner than I have ever been before in my entire life, my hair was no longer black.

"What's happened to your hair," Carolyn said. "Your hair is green." To be fair, my hair was green with a tint of yellow. I confessed, and took a shower.

"Why would you ever do such a stupid thing?" she asked. (By the way, this is a woman who has always accused me of being insufficiently vain.)

"I guess I wanted to feel young," I sheepishly replied.

Before I try to turn this into a sermon, I have to tell you one more completely embarrassing story. It is the same story. I was 16, away on summer break. I was working at a ranch. All the girls put lemon in their hair to lighten it in the sun. At the end of the summer, liking the effect but a month behind and needing to catch up, I put lemon, lots of lemon, in my hair. Nothing seemed to happen. So I added a full bottle of peroxide. This was a mistake. It was a bad mistake. My hair turned bright orange.

With three days till school, all I could do was to cut it all off. So I had very short, very bright orange hair. To draw attention away from it -- I've never had much of a sense for fashion -- I went to school the first day in a bright orange shirt and electric orange socks. I looked like a carrot on speed. Clearly, dying my hair was one thing I would never do again.

So here I am, thirty-four years later, preaching a sermon on what I have learned. Obviously, in certain respects, not a heck of a lot. But even here, maybe something. Maybe that all of us are at least a little insecure. Maybe that we try to camouflage our insecurities sometimes in superficial ways. Maybe that, when do we embarrass ourselves, the best thing we can do is get a good laugh out of it. Even let others laugh at us and with us. My favorite line in all theology is G. K. Chesterton's quip that "Angels fly because they take themselves lightly." By the same token, the devil fell on account of his gravity. In general, we humans are remarkably, if not always intentionally, humorous creatures.

It's not a bad thing to laugh at ourselves. In fact, it's a good thing. I may have learned this out of necessity, but I also have learned that if we don't laugh at ourselves, we may be overly tempted to be severe with others.

For instance, my memory of orange hair, not to mention the foot-long proto-Ziggy Top beard and very distressed levis made at least half way decent by safety-pins that I sported in college, stilled my tongue this summer when my eldest son, who in other ways is quite stunningly successful, showed me his nipple ring. To a parent there is nothing stunningly successful about a nipple ring. But, given that I was about to have green hair, I a very pleased with myself for giving the nipple ring a pass.

So that's the first thing I have to say this morning. If you can, when you can, give yourself and others a free pass. Accept and forgive. Lighten up.

Just remember, all of us are going to die. And when we do, none of us is going to have much more than the faintest idea what life was all about.

If there is a heaven, and if I go to heaven, my guess is that I will have scored more points by being kind to taxi cab drivers and over-tipping waitresses, than for anything else I have done or not done.

I must admit, I don't think much about heaven, but I have always -- and in this job you have too -- thought a lot about death. As most of you know, my own definition of religion is a simple one. Religion is our human response to the dual reality of being alive and having to die. We are the animal who knows it is going to die and therefore questions what life means. These are religious questions. They are religious questions, both for atheists and true believers.

Over the years, I have come to believe that what our lives mean has far more to do with what they mean to others than with what they mean to ourselves. I have also slowly begun to realize -- even though I often fail to act on this, that when we are too absorbed with ourselves --with our careers, positions, needs, even our dreams -- we close others out, and our circle of meaning is diminished.

For me, therefore, one of the great things about turning fifty is this. I am finally beginning to reckonize -- and this is truly redemptive -- most of the things I dreamed of accomplishing, I will not. For instance, though I have been blessed with the opportunity of writing books, I am never going to be guilty of committing a best seller. For me, spiritually, at least today -- you may have to check back tomorrow -- that is more of a relief than in is a disappointment.

We should always do our best. Of course we should. We should always strive to do better in our lines of work. But to get obsessed about our accomplishments (so often framed in a negative print image against others' apparent but often imagined accomplishments) only serves to cut us off from others, even, and sometimes especially, from the people who have the best chance of redeeming our lives.

Think about these people. Our family. Our coworkers. Our friends. If we let them, they redeem our lives by loving us for who we are, not for who we'd like to be. They redeem them by challenging us to be better people in little ways, not major ways, the little ways in which we can surely change to make their own lives better, their own lives and ours as well. And finally, perhaps most importantly, they redeem our lives by reminding us daily that their own lives are as important as our own. As important, as flawed, and as wonderful.

In this regard, much of what I have learned in life are the things I know I have to keep learning. Love takes practice. And kindness, that too. And forgiveness. Even self-acceptance takes practice. This is simple, daily, and supremely important stuff.

For me, my most important teacher is my wife, though she is and probably always will be frustrated at how poor I sometimes am with my lessons. My children also teach me. In part they teach me to remember what it is like to be a child. Not to be childish, but to be a child. We all are children. We continue to be children. Ultimately -- and I do believe this, I finally believe this -- we are children of God. That, of course, is another sermon.

As I close these remarks, I realize that I may be as guilty this morning as the person who says to you, "Well, enough about me. What do you think of my hat?" All I can promise is, my next sermon, whether you like it or not, will have nothing to do with my hat.

But I will say this. You are all, almost every one of you, far more lovable and forgivable people than you think you are. I know that. And you need to hear that. You need to hear it from the pulpit, even if you have to put up with the preacher saying that he himself is actually a far more lovable and forgivable person than he thinks he is. Not that he fully believes it. None of us does, not fully. If we did, we might be dangerous, far more dangerous than we actually are.

What I can say this morning, without exaggeration, is that I love you. I love you not only for the little things you do to make this world, our world, a slightly better place, but also for accepting your failings when you fail; for your weaknesses, which connect you to all of us; for daring to expose yourselves by reaching out for help; and also, perhaps especially, for your courage (most of us are far more courageous than we know) in times of trial.

I can also say this. I need you just as much as you need me. That goes for you too, for you and others. Especially in matters of faith and spirit, we need one another. We need one another's love and inspiration, others critique and chastisement, not more -- that would be silly -- but at least as much as we need our own self-love and self-esteem. And they need us too. They need us as much as we need them. Salvation may be an individual quest, but redemption is a corporate enterprise.

That's all I have to say this morning. Thinking about it, I retract my apology. I really haven't been talking about me. I've been talking about us. And we're okay.

Amen. I love you. May God bless us all.  
Copyright AllSouls 1998. copyright exception not for profit, educational
http://www.allsoulsnyc2.org/publications/sermons/fcsermons/how-my-mind-changed.html
--------------------------
love, Larry
-----------------------------------
[n.b. The full text of another sermon by Forrest Church with links to yet others can be found at sent 11/28/13 all positive--Happy Thanksgiving brief exchange plus "The Devil in the Details" Forrest Church February 27, 2000]

sent 11/28/13 all positive--Happy Thanksgiving brief exchange plus "The Devil in the Details" Forrest Church February 27, 2000

Subject: all positive--Happy Thanksgiving brief exchange plus "The Devil in the Details" Forrest Church February 27, 2000

This is about my response to an image I was just exposed to by a friend.  Here's the image followed by my response.  I hope you agree with me that it's worth sharing, on this Thanksgiving day.  Nothing's going to leap out and hurt you this time, I promise! :-)
[I'm afraid you'll have to look at 
https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=411976792252350&set=a.213218838794814.45606.211856132264418&type=1&theater
to see the image.  Pasting it in here does not work.]

My reply: All we can do is our best. :-)  Larry

That was the brief exchange.  Now, here is the "plus."  Please both keep in mind and try to forget about the fact that it's dated--look at the date!  If you read slowly you can update it in your mind as you read, and thereby give it the appropriate potential importance for you, wherever you might be at this moment. 

--------by Forest Church live to 800(?) people all at once--a lot anyway---------

The Devil in the Details

Forrest Church    February 27, 2000

It is tempting at about this point in almost any national political campaign to give up on religion altogether. When such pillars of the right wing pundit corps as William Safire and Cal Thomas plead for a religious cease fire before both of their party's candidates get permanently scarred by the spiritual cross fire, it is easy to imagine how the rest of us may feel. "People who are supposed to serve a higher kingdom," Mr. Thomas complains, "have shown that they can get down and dirty with the best of the pagans." From Pat Robertson's calumny of Senator Warren Rudman, a conservative Jew, as an unconscionable bigot because of his pro-choice stand to the McCain forces using Governor Bush's ill-considered appearance at Bob Jones University to accuse him of Catholic bashing, we have had a steady diet for weeks now of what Mr. Safire aptly calls "religio-political sleaze." Such vitriol feeds on itself. It is hard to posture as justly inflamed if you too are caught with a flame-thrower in your hands. To change the metaphor slightly, moralists who live in glass houses shouldn't throw orgies.

No fires burn with more incendiary passion than do religious fires. The most intractable divisions in the world today are sponsored by competing Gods, even sometimes competing Christian Gods. When our nation's forbears in their wisdom established a separation of church and state, they were trying to protect religion from being compromised by political agendas as much as they were attempting to protect religious minorities from dogmatic tyranny should a religious party ever assume power.

Though it is less blatant, I am almost as concerned by political attempts to cozy up to Jesus in cozenly attempts to sway Christian voters. The leading democratic candidate wears a bracelet that reads, "What would Jesus do?" His still likely opponent in the Fall says that Jesus is his favorite philosopher.

I'm sorry. When it comes to the shaping of our national domestic and foreign agenda, I don't want my president asking what Jesus would do? Oh, I might be a little tempted, but only if he let me choose the right passages. For instance, in Matthew 25, when Jesus' followers ask him how to get to heaven, he says that when you die there is a quiz. As it turns out the questions have nothing to do with denying a woman the right to choose, opposing federal gun control, or protecting the sanctity of the confederate flag. They are "Did you feed the hungry, shelter the homeless, clothe the naked, heal the sick, and visit those in prison?" Nonetheless, the Bible can be adduced in support of almost any political position. For or against capital punishment. Even for or against Gay rights, at least if the spirit of the finest scriptures are weighed against the letter of conflicting testimony in the smallest of small print. Remember, the Bible lended moral (or immoral) support both to those who supported and those who opposed slavery in the years leading up to the Civil War. In its pages, if you choose the wrong ones, the Bible has nasty things to say about everything from women to shellfish. It is for this reason that Shakespeare said, "The devil can quote scripture for his purposes."

For this reason I have as much trouble with the Bible haters as I do with the Bible bangers. From one such Bible-hater, I received a curious e-mail attack on my own theology this week. It reveals less about my actual theological views than about the starkly literalistic anti-religious attitudes of the writer, but that is the nature of such attacks. They say more about their author than their target. For instance, whatever you may think of George W. Bush, he is certainly not anti-Catholic. His own brother is a Catholic. And do a majority of political reporters actually worship Zeus as one religious zealot from the past weeks salvos creatively exclaimed. Please! In any event, for the sake of balance, let's not to forget the fundamentalists of the left. Here is the e-mail I received.

"Greetings.

"The will of God, revealed in the Scriptures, included genocide.

"Witness the Israelites slaughtering their enemies. Not a woman

or child is permitted to survive in some cases. It fosters a

Godhead that knows the outcome of His creation, separating

the saved from the damned before those souls had a chance to

choose, compelling them to accept his Grace and those whose fate

is outside the drawing power of the Holy Spirit, the ostensible

blame rests solely on the transgressor, justifying the wrath of God.

"If you want citings of scripture, I'll provide! If you read the

Bible, you know what I say is true. Why do you worship this Deity?

"How can you bend your natural sense of what is just?"

Not only am I tired of the bigotry sponsored by religion, I have just as little use for anti-religious bigotry. It is just as literal-minded, mean-spirited and incendiary. For every instigator of genocide who uses scripture to launch a secular Jihad, there are always religious martyrs who, powered by their faith, give their lives in witness against these same atrocities. In fact, the four greatest genocides of the last century, in Europe, Russia, China, and Cambodia, were sponsored either by Nazis or Marxists, certainly not by Christians and Jews.

I started writing a new book last week, my own take on a twenty-first century theology. Two primary tests my theology must pass are these. First, does it enhance my own reverence for the creation, that is to say, does it invoke in my heart and mind a sense of awe and thereby promote deep humility in face of life's wonder and mystery. The second test is this: does it at the same time enhance my respect for those who may have different beliefs concerning the cosmic mysteries than I do; does it lead me to recognize my own tears in their eyes; does it inspire me to a realization that, for all our differences, we are truly one. Remember, as I said earlier this month, there are 25 stars in this galaxy for every person alive today on earth. In the cosmos itself, the star to human ratio is 2.5 trillion to one. This alone should inspire awe and humility; it should also remind us, that when it comes to decoding the cosmic mysteries, we are much more alike in our ignorance than we differ in our knowledge. I have long since concluded that with most theology, the devil is in the details, in competing answers to the unanswerable questions. And the devil is in us when we damn one another for beliefs that don't perfectly accord with our own.

A 21st century theology based on awe and humility offers to its adherents both breadth and focus. Honoring many different religious approaches, it only excludes the truth-claims of absolutists. Recalling my metaphor of the cathedral of the world, this is because fundamentalists-whether on the right or the left-claim that the light shines through their window only. Skeptics draw the opposite conclusion. Seeing the bewildering variety of windows and observing the folly of the worshipers, they conclude that there is no light. But the windows are not the light, only where the light ­ Truth, God, Creative power, call it what you will ­ shines through.

One reason I celebrate my ignorance of Holy secrets is that religion can be dangerous, especially on a shrinking globe where, with discrete back yards a thing of the past, conflicting faith positions contest one another in almost every human precinct. The greatest challenge to a 21st century theology is the reactionary retrenchment of competing theologies and ideologies with mutually exclusive truth-claims. The danger true-believers (or true-disbelievers) present is today compounded by the spread of religious or ideological terrorism throughout the world. But every generation has had its holy warriors, hard-bitten zealots for whom the world is large enough for only one true faith. Taught to worship at a single window, they have also been incited to demonstrate their faith by throwing rocks through other peoples' windows. Tightly drawn, their logic makes a demonic kind of sense: (1) religious answers respond to life and death questions, which happen to be the most important questions of all; (2) you and I may come up with different answers; (3) if you are right, I must be wrong; (4) but I can't be wrong, because my salvation hinges on being right; therefore, (5) short of abandoning my own faith and embracing yours, in order to secure my salvation I am driven either to ignore, convert, or destroy you.

One presumably impartial response to this war of conflicting theological passions not only at this point in a political campaign but any time at all -- is to reject religion entirely, to distance ourselves from those who attempt-always imperfectly -to interpret the cosmic runes. There are two problems with this approach. First, such a rejection deprives us of a potentially deep encounter with the mysterious forces that impel our being, thereby limiting our ability to invent and discover meaning. Second, none of us is actually able to resist interpreting the cosmic runes. Not only the world's religions, but every ideology, scientific worldview, and aesthetic school has its windows in the cathedral of the world. In each, the light and darkness mingle more or less persuasively for those whose angle of vision is tilted in that particular direction. Attracted to certain patterns of refracted light, with its partial clarification of reality, these people are also worshipers. Their windows too become shrines.

None of us is able fully to comprehend the truth that shines through another's window, nor apprehend the falsehood that we ourselves may perceive as truth. We therefore easily mistake another's good for evil, and our own evil for good. A true-appropriately humble- 21st century theology tempers the consequences of inevitable ignorance, while addressing the overarching crisis of our times: dogmatic division in an ever more intimate, fractious, and yet interdependent world. It posits the following fundamental principles:

1. There is one Reality, one Truth, one God.

2. This Reality shines through every window in the cathedral.

3. No one can perceive it directly, the mystery being forever veiled.

4. Yet, on the cathedral floor and in the eyes of each beholder, refracted and reflected through different windows in different ways, it plays in patterns that suggest meanings, challenging us to interpret and live by these meanings as best we can.

5. Each window illumines Truth (with a large T) in a unique way, leading to various truths (with a small t), and these in differing measure according to the insight, receptivity and behavior of the beholder.

One additional word here for rationalists, especially hard-bitten rationalists, fundamentalists of the left. Aristotle coined something called the Law of the Excluded Middle. As a logical certainty, he asserted that "A" and "not-A" cannot both be true at one and the same time. By the lights of my cathedral metaphor, Aristotle is wrong, at least with respect to theology. His logical certitude oversteps the law of experience. Contrast one stained-glass window (its dark center bordered by more translucent panes) with another (configured in the opposite fashion). Though the same light shines through both, it will cast diametrically opposite shadow images on the cathedral floor ("A" and "not-A," if you will). Even as we cannot gaze directly at the sun, we cannot stare directly into the light of God. All the great world scriptures make this point. No one can look God in the eye. Truth emerges only indirectly, as refracted through the windows of tradition and experience. For a 21st century theology, what the cathedral metaphor suggests is that, since the same light can be refracted in many different ways (even "A" and "not-A"), the only religious truth claims that can be discounted are those that dismiss all other claims simply for being different from their own.

One more saving bit of evidence, though the light of God is refracted through our windows in many distinctive ways, when the time comes for us to die, the same sun sets on each of our horizons. This we should be able to perceive. Rather than continuing to enlist yet another generation of terrorists for truth and God, the principle challenge of theology today is to provide symbols and metaphors that will bring us, in all our glorious diversity, into closer kinship with one another as equal sons and daughters of life and death.

Earlier this month I spoke of the Angel and the Deep Blue Sea, but don't need an ocean view to feel this. The tiniest piece of life is so grand as to outstrip all our imagining. As for our essential oneness, every one of you who comes in for pastoral counseling teaches me as powerful a lesson. As an aside, please remember, it takes more courage to ask for help than it does to help yourself. The courage of those of you who come in and share your deepest pains amazes me. And you always teach me something. When I see my tears in your eyes, I remember that truly we are one.

So I am not going to give up on religion, however many temptations this political season and unfolding world conflicts offer. In fact, even they inspire me to go in precisely the opposite direction. They inspire me to fashion a theology big enough both to encompass our many difference and to expand our hearts.

The dual reality of being alive and having to die demands a human response, often a religious response. Let's be sure that our own is worthy of the life and death we so mysteriously have inherited.

Copyright AllSouls 2000.  I am sending you this as an exception to the copyright law--not for profit, educational purpose.
---------------------------------
The above and other writings by Forrest Church (Wikipedia link):
http://www.allsoulsnyc.org/site/c.atJQL8NRJqL8H/b.6416431/k.5C78/Sermons_by_Forrest_Church.htm
I sat and listened to Forrest Church, son of Senator Frank Church, many times over a period of two years in the early 1990's.  I cried a few different times over his depth, the way he touched me.  He passed away in 2009. 

Larry

sent 11/27/13 funny--The Climate Name Change video

Subject: funny--The Climate Name Change video

http://www.upworthy.com/this-is-probably-the-funniest-most-effective-way-to-deal-with-people-who-ignore-science-facts-ever-2?c=gp1

(after watching this video I signed the petition at
http://climatenamechange.org/ --just for fun :)

--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/26/13 Ira Chernus, Chris Hedges, 90 Companies destroying our planet, and Robert Frost Shielding a Flickering Flame

1. "11/22: The Day 'Truth' Died"
November 21, 2013 by Ira Chernus   
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/21-5
This one paragraph stuck out at me. But you would be better off with the context, I think.  That's another reason to read the article, besides its author being Ira Chernus, I mean.
Compromise on matters that aren't crucial, the Mahatma advised. When moral principle is at stake, stand up for truth as you see it. Yet offer love and compassion to those who see it differently, even as you firmly resist their actions and policies. Never seek to harm them. If harm must come, let it be on you.
JFK was not the main focus of article for me.  But I do remember sending
you the link to a book once, a book written by an insider.  It said that JFK was the last United States President even to try to keep the military industrial complex under some semblance of control, President Eisenhower having been the last to do so successfully.  Do think about that for a moment or so.  Things changed then.  Things changed with JFK's death. 

2. "Shielding a Flickering Flame" by Chris Hedges November 24, 2013
http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/shielding_a_flickering_flame_20131124
Chris Hedges is brilliant here, as usual, this time on potential roles of parents vs the potential roles of people who are not parents

3. "Naming Names: The 90 Companies Destroying Our Planet"
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/11/21-0

4. One of my sisters pointed me to this Robert Frost poem this evening.  I read it to her and couldn't stop crying while I read, because of its simple beauty.  We know the country and the city, both of us.  This is significantly about gratitude for the country.  As the imagery went through my mind, so did more metaphorical meanings, as in a big "we."  It can be simple or it can be very complicated.
"The Tuft of Flowers" by Robert Frost
http://www.bartleby.com/117/24.html

--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/26/13 "The Climate Movement Needs to Stop 'Winning' "

This is one of the zoomed-in stories, referring to geography.  This woman and her neighbors will not be winning, and they are being left behind.  She's asking for some help with visible empathy and uplift where she is--in East Texas.

"The Climate Movement Needs to Stop 'Winning'" November 24, 2013
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maya-lemon/to-the-leaders-of-the-cli_b_4305189.html

-------------------------
FIGHT THE TPP*  See for help:
http://larryatblogspot.blogspot.com/2013/11/sent-112413-mark-weisbrot-on-tpp-re.html
see also http://fcnl.org/resources/toolkit/lobbying_tips/

* "Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty" It's evil and it's big. And you can help.
--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/26/13 Wikipedia Typhoon Haiyan

What a story!  Wikipedia makes a beginning at telling it.  If you've been paying attention to other events going on in the world then maybe you get it.  Otherwise, well, it's one of the biggest things that has ever happened.  Doubtless you already know more about it than I did before reading this.  But I bet you don't know everything that's in this that's worth knowing. 

"Typhoon Haiyan"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Typhoon_Haiyan

I am not suggesting what you should do to help.  If you want to help directly I'm sure you can find some suggestions on this page:
http://reliefweb.int/disaster/tc-2013-000139-phl

--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/26/13 Disagreement without the Hate

"Disagreement without the Hate"
by Laura Finley November 26, 2013
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/26-3

This is not about going peacefully to the slaughter.  It's about making sense.
--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/26/13 repeat: Rev. Trumbore on the conversational game, "ain't it awful"

Subject: repeat: Rev. Trumbore on the conversational game, "ain't it awful"

Please read the linked page slowly, very slowly, so your mind can work as you're reading. (Ref Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow) Larry
http://www.uumin.org/sam/sermons/s554.htm

----February 1, 2009------------
Subject: Rev. Trumbore on the conversational game, "ain't it awful"

You may be familiar with a book called Games People Play: The Basic Handbook of Transactional Analysis. by Eric Berne.

paperback: http://www.amazon.com/Games-People-Play-Transactional-Analysis/dp/0345410033/
kindle: http://www.amazon.com/Games-People-Play-Psychology-Relationships-ebook/dp/B005C6E76U/

It is one of the books from the transactional analysis (TA) movement among therapists that includes I'm OK, You're OK, by Thomas Harris. For your reference, Games People Play contains the framing of the conversational game known as "ain't it awful."

I stumbled upon this amazing sermon by Rev. Sam Trumbore late last night and read it this morning.  It's title is "Ain't it Awful." Rev. Trumbore carries the explanation for why people might play the "ain't it awful" game to greater depth than I remember from any of the TA books.  If you already have some understanding of  the "ain't it awful" game then I commend Rev. Trumbore's sermon to you to refresh your recollection.  If this is your first encounter with the concept of the "ain't it awful" game in transactional analysis then I hope and trust that Rev. Trumbore's sermon will be a good first introduction for you.  It's important.

http://www.uumin.org/sam/sermons/s554.htm
--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/25/13 respectful suggestions

This is something I wrote for one particular person and then modified, by adding the P.S. for one other person.  You might find the review worthwhile.  Again, if you need one or the other of the original sources for some reason I can find them.  For now I want to avoid making things unnecessarily complicated, and I mean unnecessarily complicated for you, not me. :-)  love, Larry
-----------------------------------
Dear <>,

These are things I've gleaned from wise old writings that you can probably identify.  I could find them but do not need to, and am I not suggesting that you should look for the originals either.  My point is these are not things I just thought up without help.  If you want the sources but cannot find them I will put my mind to it; I do have clues as to where to look.

1. Use mental discipline to avoid spending your time comparing yourself with others.  There's always someone to admire and always someone to look down upon.

2. Put out of your mind the things about which something needs to be done but that you yourself can do nothing about.  This exercise does NOT require the help of the unnamed, but it might require getting into a meditative state to sort out where you might be able to do something vs where it's beyond your power, yourself personally. In the process calm yourself down.  Then do whatever seems to you the next thing to do.

Those two thoughts deserve two separate emails and at least one million Facebook posts.  Oh well.  I've got breakfast coming shortly. :-)

Respectfully,
Larry

P.S. This was not in the original sources specifically, but: For you I would add a respectful suggestion for each and every time you catch yourself wishing you were somewhere else, that you instantly switch your mind to a different topic except when there is something that you can actually do right then to further the interest of being somewhere else.  This is a subcategory under number 2 above. :-)

--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/24/13 Mark Weisbrot on the TPP Re: "America's Little Spy Helpers Down Under Create an Uproar"--guess where my sympathies are

Mark Weisbrot on the TPP Re: "America's Little Spy Helpers Down Under Create an Uproar"--guess where my sympathies are

You might remember the name Mark Weisbrot.  He is very smart in my estimation and I have sent you links to writings of his in the past.  I just now happened upon this big article, paragraph after next, published only five days ago in The Guardian.

I remind you of the links in my just previous message below to help you do something to oppose the TPP.  It's important, it's a mass uprising like the successful one against the attack on Syria recently.  I just hope it will be big enough.  I hope you can find a few minutes to add your weight and I hope that you will help take this VIRAL.  That's what we need right now, I kid you not.

The Trans-Pacific Partnership treaty is the complete opposite of 'free trade': The TPP would strip our constitutional rights, while offering no gains for the majority of Americans. It's a win for corporations
by Mark Weisbrot November 19, 2013
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/nov/19/trans-pacific-partnership-corporate-usurp-congress

THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR HELPING NOW AND ALSO THANK YOU FOR ANY PAST HELP WITH THIS EVIL THING!

Larry

On 11/24/2013 7:08 PM, Larry Scott wrote:
"America's Little Spy Helpers Down Under Create an Uproar" November 24, 2013
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/24-0

I am glad that some people are still fighting hard against neoconservative surveillance.  That's one of the biggest things--not the only big thing--that WE are fighting in opposing the "Trans-Pacific Partnership."  Thank you for your past efforts if you have made some efforts and please start if you haven't done anything and keep at it if you have.
http://act.demandprogress.org/letter/TPP3/?rd=1

PLEASE ACT AND MAKE THIS VIRAL

In addition or instead, use http://capwiz.com/fconl/dbq/officials/ a way to have the FCNL (Friends Committee on National Legislation) send each of your officials a FAX from you, which saves having to use paper if you want to write a letter.  By the way, the FCNL also offers to send a paper letter for you if you like, with your text, just as if you had sent it yourself.  At the above linked page, put in your zip code, get your representatives' pictures, click on a picture, and click the second tab on the next page to see the link for using the FCNL's automation.  Click.  It's easy once one gets used to it.

See also http://larryatblogspot.blogspot.com/2013/10/sent-1021-please-act-reminder-and-more.html
and http://larryatblogspot.blogspot.com/2013/10/sent-101913-time-to-act-and-make-this.html

Larry

--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry


sent 11/24/13 "America's Little Spy Helpers Down Under Create an Uproar"--guess where my sympathies are

"America's Little Spy Helpers Down Under Create an Uproar" November 24, 2013
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/24-0

I am glad that some people are still fighting hard against neoconservative surveillance.  That's one of the biggest things--not the only big thing--that WE are fighting in opposing the "Trans-Pacific Partnership."  Thank you for your past efforts if you have made some efforts and please start if you haven't done anything and keep at it if you have.
http://act.demandprogress.org/letter/TPP3/?rd=1

PLEASE ACT AND MAKE THIS VIRAL

In addition or instead, use http://capwiz.com/fconl/dbq/officials/ a way to have the FCNL (Friends Committee on National Legislation) send each of your officials a FAX from you, which saves having to use paper if you want to write a letter.  By the way, the FCNL also offers to send a paper letter for you if you like, with your text, just as if you had sent it yourself.  At the above linked page, put in your zip code, get your representatives' pictures, click on a picture, and click the second tab on the next page to see the link for using the FCNL's automation.  Click.  It's easy once one gets used to it.

See also http://larryatblogspot.blogspot.com/2013/10/sent-1021-please-act-reminder-and-more.html
and http://larryatblogspot.blogspot.com/2013/10/sent-101913-time-to-act-and-make-this.html

Larry

--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/24/13 Serious progress for US--you other Americans and me--the deal with Iran

Subject: Serious progress for US--you other Americans and me--the deal with Iran

"Israel Fumes as World Powers Make 'Historic' Deal With Iran" November 24, 2013
http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2013/11/24

This article concerns the deal world powers made with Iran today.  It is cause for celebration, something for which to include our thanks on this coming holiday.  It appears that--dare I say it?--Israel and AIPAC--once not long ago the most influential lobby in Congress second only to the AARP--have lost just a bit of their grip on the U.S. government.  That too is a good thing.  Perhaps it will become a new habit.  Perhaps the American people will become of more interest than the "neoconservatives" who've been mostly responsible for the years-long push to attack Iran.  Probably not.  AIPAC is right in the center of those "neoconservatives" who are mentioned in the article.  Neoconservatives are not known to give up easily at all.  If you have been with me for awhile you might remember that you know a lot about this.  Maybe now the neoconservatives will come up with some new big excuse for a big military attack somewhere else, just to keep up their businesses.  But it is possible that the world is so against any big U.S. military attack that the neoconservatives will be forced to say under control--for a bit longer anyway.  Let us see how things go in Afghanistan.  We need to watch our butts, and by "we" I mean you and I!  Not that we need to lose our minds over it.  Just pay enough attention to exert influence if and when the opportunity might arise.

Larry

--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/22/13 Brilliant: The art of being miserable: "The 14 Habits of Highly Miserable People"

Subject: Brilliant: The art of being miserable: "The 14 Habits of Highly Miserable People"

I think you will find this well worth the read.  If it's not much about you then it's probably about one or more of the people you know.

http://www.alternet.org/personal-health/14-habits-highly-miserable-people
--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/19/13 THE SOLUTION: emergency contraction

Subject: THE SOLUTION: emergency contraction

A friend of mine perpetually complains about scientists for not publishing instant solutions for the problems they find out about.  Well this has the most realistic suggestion solution for "solving" the climate disaster problem: "emergency contraction."  So I hope he will be happy with this.  You may not think it's actually realistic, but it seems to be the most hopeful solution.  I would like to think that you will read it very slowly and very carefully for maximum benefit--benefit meaning enhanced ability to plan for yourself and those you love.

"'Sleepwalking to Extinction': Capitalism and the Destruction of Life and Earth"
by Richard Smith November 15, 2013
https://www.adbusters.org/magazine/110/sleepwalking-extinction.html
or
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/11/15-3?print


See also:
"How Science Is Telling Us All To Revolt"
by Naomi Klein October 29, 2013
http://www.newstatesman.com/2013/10/science-says-revolt
or
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/10/29-4?print

background book: The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines by Michael Martin (Cornell University Press March 6, 2012)
paperback: http://www.amazon.com/Hockey-Stick-Climate-Wars-Dispatches/dp/0231152558
kindle: http://www.amazon.com/Hockey-Stick-Climate-Wars-Dispatches-ebook/dp/B0072N4U6S

What is the hockey stick? Here's a picture:

[the picture is the graph on the next linked page. I can't same to paste it in here, sorry]


Hint: the red part is the hockey stick handle, still going up since 2001 according to more recent depictions that I've seen. 

--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/10/13 correspondence with the scientist Re: Top 11 Biggest Lies of Mainstream Nutrition

Subject: correspondence with the scientist Re: Top 11 Biggest Lies of Mainstream Nutrition

I wrote to the scientist who sent me this:
LS: I was in a hurry last night and did not read this carefully until this morning--not my usual practice.  Anyway, WOW, this is radical!  I am counting on your knowing something about this guy's reputation from other sources.

This is the answer I just received:
Scientist: Actually none of these points are new to me. I sent it around because it is a reasonably concise statement of points I agree with and practice due to reading from many serious sources.

Add 2 more recommendations: eat lots of good veggies, especially kale, and add eat some organic home fermented foods every day.

Then you have the diet that works for me and our household.
--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

On 11/9/2013 11:49 PM, Larry Scott wrote:
...
Repeating the next link.  "Foods to avoid" is NOT the right heading for this one at all.
"Top 11 Biggest Lies of Mainstream Nutrition"
http://eatlocalgrown.com/article/12317-top-11-biggest-lies-of-mainstream-nutrition.html

sent 11/9/13 US Regional Cultures / Historical basis

Subject: US Regional Cultures / Historical basis

"Up in Arms"
http://www.tufts.edu/alumni/magazine/fall2013/features/up-in-arms.html
--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/9/13 Top 11 Biggest Lies of Mainstream Nutrition

This is important enough for me to break my recently anticipated silence.  It's from my scientist sister, who is very often right about things.

Top 11 Biggest Lies of Mainstream Nutrition
http://eatlocalgrown.com/article/12317-top-11-biggest-lies-of-mainstream-nutrition.html

Here's an extra:
"10 American Foods that are Banned in Other Countries"
http://eatlocalgrown.com/article/11944-banned-foods.html


--
I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top. love, Larry

sent 11/1/13 something very clear; great song; perhaps the last for awhile

Subject: something very clear; great song; perhaps the last for awhile

John Buell has managed to put into clear English much that I have been pointing out to you piecemeal.  It is a seriously great article in terms of clarity and synthesis.

If you read his article--I would not have chosen the title--then you may have it put together, a lot of stuff that many people think is worth keeping in mind--or way in the back of our minds anyway, most of the time hopefully, for the possibility that the knowledge might affect one or another of our actions in some way that is positive.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/10/31-3?print

I may slow down or stop this for awhile.  For one thing I want to avoid burying some of the things I've written lately.  Thank you for listening.  I don't expect that I am your only source of news. :-)

Oh, and by the way, here's a song for you, "Still a Believer," sung by Natalie Dawn.  It is a very cheerful.
Use the triangular play button on this page
http://ge.tt/3tzhrvw/v/0
If you care to look you will see that you can also download the song for your local player.

Larry

--
New tagline: I try to be aware of as much as possible and then let the positive go to the top --LAS